10 Major Social Problems That Could Be Fixed With Innovative Solutions

10 Major Social Problems That Could Be Fixed With Innovative Solutions

The difference between where human civilization started and where it is today is mind-boggling. Despite our experiences and great achievements, there are still a lot of problems that plague contemporary society. In order to tackle these problems, innovation is going to be needed. The ideas in this list go against the norm or what is expected, but are they too radical? Or could they help save the world?

10. Youth Unemployment

Youth unemployment is a major problem in many countries. In the United States, youth employment has gone down in the past five years, but it is still at 11.1 percent, while the overall unemployment rate is just 5.5 percent. In Canada, the youth unemployment rate is 15.5 percent, while the national average is about half that. It’s even worse in Europe, with almost a quarter of people between the ages of 18 and 24 unemployed. One way to stem this problem is for employers to offer young people a shortened workweek. Instead of a full-time job, they would start off at 80 percent of the workload and paycheck. This would create 10–20 percent more jobs in the market.

The reason to direct this initiative at young people instead of implementing it for everyone is a phenomenon called the endowment effect. It is the theory that people get attached to possession, money, and privilege, and once someone has those things, it’s hard to take them away. But young people won’t have that problem, because there is nothing to take away from them; they gain 80 percent of the job.

A shortened workweek for a large segment of the workforce has also been suggested as a solution to aid the economy. A shorter workweek would theoretically lower a person’s carbon footprint, improve employee morale, reduce unemployment, reduce the cost of childcare, and improve the economy.

9. Climate Change

According to researchers, the damage from climate change is irreversible, but it is stoppable. In order to even slow it down, some innovative ideas are going to be needed. One of the more interesting ideas is from a geoengineering team called the SPICE project (Stratospheric Particle Injection for Climate Engineering) from the United Kingdom. They are looking to help slow down climate change by making an “artificial volcano.”

The inspiration for the project came from the aftermath of the 1991 eruption of Mount Pinatubo in the Philippines. During the eruption, 20 million tons of sulfate particles were spewed into the atmosphere, which cooled the Earth by half a degree for the next 18 months. SPICE’s plan is to use a hose on a tethered balloon. Through the hose, they would pump some type of particle into the air that would reflect sunlight and cool down the planet.

Environmental groups have been critical of geoengineering and SPICE in particular. They are worried that geoengineering may affect the ecosystem and weather patterns. Undeterred, Project SPICE is currently looking for the most suitable particle and the best delivery system to hopefully cool down the planet and slow down the effects of climate change.

8. Gun Control

One of Chris Rock’s most famous jokes, which was featured in Bowling for Columbine, is his bullet control bit. He said that the way to control gun violence is to make bullets outrageously expensive. While it is an incredibly insightful joke, bullet control was actually put forth by New York Senator Daniel Patrick Moynihan in 1993. His idea to stem gun violence was to put an exorbitant tax on certain types of bullets. He wasn’t going to tax bullets that were generally used in target practice or hunting, but he definitely would put them on other types of ammunition, like hollow points. Moynihan wanted to make a box of 20 bullets cost $1,500. The argument against overpriced ammo was that the government would be interfering with the free market.

Another possible solution for stopping some gun violence is to use smart gun technology. These smart guns would ensure that only an individual, or a few people, could fire the gun. This type of technology, which was utilized by James Bond in Skyfall, has been around for a few years, and a number of companies have developed different techniques to ensure that only registered people can fire it. One technology utilizes fingerprints. Another company uses a wristwatch that sends off a frequency to the gun and activates it. Yet another uses hand biometrics, and those are just a few. These guns could significantly cut down the 11,000 deaths caused by stolen guns. That number doesn’t even include police officers who are killed in the line of duty with their own gun.

Smart guns are not sold in the United States, despite studies that have shown that most gun owners support the idea. The reason they aren’t sold is essentially because safety is not a selling point when it comes to guns. Gun owners would rather have immediate access to a reliable gun. Also, strong supporters of the Second Amendment think that this could lead to stronger control over the sale and use of firearms.

7. Refugees

The Syrian refugee crisis is currently putting strain on a lot of countries, but the world has had a massive displacement problem for quite some time. Currently, there are 60 million displaced people, and 20 million of them are refugees. No matter where the millions of refugees end up, it will be a complicated ordeal for the hosting country and for the refugees themselves.

One solution to the problem may be to simply give refugees their own new country. The “Refugee Nation,” suggested by Israeli real estate millionaire Jason Buzi, would involve buying underpopulated and underdeveloped land somewhere in the world and then making it a place where refugees can flee to and get their lives started again.

Critics have said that the plan is flawed because it’s based on exclusivity and trying to keep people out. While there is definitely some truth to that, a permanent refugee nation has a lot of humanitarian benefits as well. Notably, a working nation with an economy, permanent housing, and social services is much better than the inhumane refugee camps in which people find themselves living for years without a job and relying on aid. Conversely, refugees would be able to work and live in the Refugee Nation, meaning that less aid will be needed in the long run. The ultimate goal would be for the Refugee Nation to develop its own organic government.

Of course, creating a new nation from scratch with millions of refugees from different countries would be an incredibly complex task. Besides logistics, it would also require a lot of compromise between nations with conflicting views on how to govern.

6. Homelessness

Homelessness is one of the oldest problems in the world, but it really took off during the Industrial Revolution. In the US, which has the highest GDP in the world, there were over 610,000 people who were in homeless shelters on any given night in January 2013. Almost a quarter of them were children under age 18.

There are a few suggestions on how homelessness can be tackled. One of the more innovative ways is simply to build permanent housing where people can live for free. That happened in Medicine Hat, Alberta, and as a result, it will be the first city in North America to eliminate homelessness. Medicine Hat will provide free housing to anyone who has to stay in an emergency center for more than 10 days if they have do not have a safe place to go afterward.

The logic behind permanent housing makes fiscal sense as well, because it is much more cost-effective than traditional homeless shelters. In Medicine Hat, if someone were to live on the street, it could cost the government up to $100,000 in related services. While free, permanent homes would only cost the city about $20,000 per person. Utah has a similar program, and they found that the cost of housing someone in permanent homes was $10,000–$12,000, while it was about $20,000 if they were living on the street and in shelters.

Feasibility is another problem, but what’s interesting is that the United States has 14.2 million abandoned houses scattered within its borders. Even a fraction of these abandoned buildings could be converted into housing for the homeless. This is exactly how a nonprofit organization called Breaking Ground tackles homelessness. They fix dilapidated buildings in New York City and make them high-quality transitional apartments, complete with social services for its residences. Their first project was converting the Times Square Hotel in 1994, and it is still open today.

Of course, some people will argue that this is just the government giving free houses to lazy people, but this is an unfortunate stigma connected to homelessness. Many people are homeless due to mental illness, not because they are lazy.

5. The Prison System

In most places in the United States, when someone is charged with a crime, the judge may choose to impose bail, which requires the accused to put up a certain amount of money as collateral to guarantee that they appear for their trial. Alternatively, they can await trial either in a county jail or a maximum security prison.

The bail system has become a major problem among people with low income because they may not be able to afford bail. The problem is so rampant that in January 2015, 730,000 people, most of whom were nonviolent offenders, were imprisoned for the simple fact that they couldn’t afford bail. In places like New Jersey, 40 percent of all incarcerated people are there because they couldn’t afford bail. In Riker’s Island, a maximum security prison, about 85 percent of detainees are simply awaiting trial. This problem is a huge contributing factor to the overcrowding of the US prison system, and it also cost $22 billion per year to house all of the people who are in jail because they couldn’t afford to post bail.

Besides the pressure on the prison system, locking someone up because they can’t afford bail can be disastrous to the arrestee’s life. While sitting in prison, even without being convicted, they will also probably lose their job. With the loss of a family member, some inmates’ families may have to rely more on social benefits, putting even more strain on the system. Finally, people will often plead guilty even if they are innocent because if they plead not guilty and wait to go to trial, they’ll have to sit in prison for months.

One possible solution is simply to eliminate the bail system for people who can’t afford it. This will decrease the amount of people in prison, and it keeps innocent and nonviolent offenders out of prison altogether. (There’s even a precedent for not charging bail in the US, as Washington, DC, has pretty much eliminated bail for those who can’t afford it.) In lieu of bail, pretrial service specialists would decide if someone is a flight risk, could be a danger to the public, or both. If they’re not, they’d be sent home, possibly being given an ankle monitor or having to do drug tests. When the court date is coming up, pretrial services would call the person to remind them to show up at their court date. These systems are cheaper, easier, and much more humane than imprisoning people who haven’t been convicted of crimes solely because they’re poor.

4. Declining Postal Services

The postal service was once a vital part of civilized life. But since the Internet has become more popular, mail has decreased in volume, and private mail services have become more popular. As a result, the United States Postal Service (USPS) announced that they lost $5.1 billion in the 2015 fiscal year. Other countries like Canada and Australia have a similar problem. Yet, the mail service is still a necessity, especially to people who don’t use computers.

In order to make the post office relevant in contemporary times, some post offices in Europe and Asia offer banking services to generate revenue. Looking to this model, US presidential candidate Bernie Sanders has suggested converting post offices into banks. It would be relatively inexpensive because the USPS already has a large network with outlets in almost every city and town in the United States.

Converting post offices to banks would have a twofold effect: It would hopefully make the USPS profitable, and it would help Americans with low incomes. Many low-income Americans can’t get traditional banking services because banks don’t want them as customers. Instead, they are forced to go to check-cashing outlets that blatantly exploit them with outrageous fees and service charges. And this isn’t just a small-scale problem: 20–40 percent of Americans have used these check-cashing places.

3. Food Production

One of the biggest fears among people is overpopulation. While most cities won’t look like Blade Runner, there is one major problem that will come with the projected growth of people: feeding everyone. According to projections by the United Nations, the population of Earth will be 9.6 billion by 2050, and if we stay on our current trajectory for food production, we won’t have enough food to feed everyone. (Obviously, our food production has kept pace with our population in the past, despite recurring doomsday predictions.) Over the next 35 years, production will rise 38–67 percent, but it needs to rise 60–110 percent.

Researchers at MIT are looking to solve this problem through a project calledCityFARM. The project is seeking to make urban farms more efficient through data science and monitoring every individual plant with sensors that “listen” to the crops. In the experimental lab at MIT, plants are monitored by 30 sensors, which send information back to a computer every eight seconds regarding how much carbon and nutrients the crops need. Using the sensors, the crops will get everything they need in low quantities, making the process of growing food much more efficient. In fact, it will use 98 percent less water than conventional farms. It will also quadruple the growth speed of vegetables while eliminating the need for chemical fertilizers and pesticides. Finally, the nutrient density of the crops will be doubled, and the flavor can be strengthened or changed. Then, once the ideal “recipe” is ready, the data is loaded onto an open source database, where anyone can download it to grow their own crops by plugging the data into their own farm.

Besides making the process of growing crops more efficient, CityFARM will also eliminate another big problem, which is the shipment of food. Sometimes, food is shipped long distances, a wasteful use of resources that leaves a large carbon footprint. Using the CityFARM technology, every city could have one block dedicated to these farms, and it would feed the entire population. The leader of the project, Caleb Harper, says that the plan is tobuild one billion of these tiny urban farms in cities around the world.

2. Water Scarcity

It may be shocking to people in first-world countries, who defecate and urinate in clean water and flush it down the toilet, that 783 million people do not have access to clean water. In addition to that, 2.5 billion people do not have access to adequate sanitation. Looking to solve both problems is Peter Janicki’s Omniprocessor, which extracts water from human waste.

Sewer sludge is put into the Omniprocessor, where it is boiled in a large tube. The water vapor escapes from the waste and goes into a cleaning system inside the machine. Within minutes, it is filtered, and clean water is available. One machine can continually provide clean water to 100,000 people. But what really makes the Omniprocessor so innovative is that the leftover waste is turned into steam, which powers the machine. If there is leftover power, it goes to powering the community.

The Omniprocessor is personally supported by Bill Gates, who drank its water and said he would drink it every day. The project to build and install them throughout the world is also supported by the Gates Foundation.

1. Third-World Poverty

Third-World Country
Would you notice if a tiny tax, cheaper than a cup of coffee, was tacked on each time you made a large luxury purchase? For example, would you notice $1.50 being taken off a vacation you spent $1,500 on? Most people probably wouldn’t notice or care, and while it may not be noticeable to the consumer, all of that money combined could mean billions of dollars for people living in poverty. Philippe Douste-Blazy, a French cardiologist and a special adviser to the secretary general of the UN in charge of innovative financing for development, tested this theory using a service charge on tickets for flights out of France. The service charge was €1 (about US$1.50), and between 2006 and 2014, they made $2 billion and received no complaints about the levy.

Of course, these “invisible donations” can be used to fund a whole host of projects. Currently, Douste-Blazy has been using the funds from the airline tickets on initiatives to fight HIV and AIDS, tuberculosis, and malaria in third-world countries. He says that public health is a cornerstone of a good economic system. If people are healthy, they can go to school, get a job, and contribute to an economy, which in turn grows the country’s GDP. Douste-Blazy hopes that this type of financing could lead to greater global stabilization.



3 replies on “10 Major Social Problems That Could Be Fixed With Innovative Solutions”

10: We had a 7 day work week, which was reduced to 6 days and then to 5 days; not 4 days is proposed. Shouldn’t we just skip ahead to one day a week of working on the clock and employers can continue to demand insane productivity so that only people prepared to do a full week’s job on one day’s wages can get promoted? It’s better for everybody.

9: Te best way to destroy the world would be widespread climate manipulation. Creating something analogous to a nuclear winter to balance out CO2 emissions is not a solution. Nevertheless, if you have capital to spare, there will surely be investment niches to profit from the catastrophe.

8: The solution is to ban guns and ammunition, have a temporary amnesty, then enforce gun elimination vigorously, but America doesn’t have the spine for that because you are scared of your underclasses. So instead, I will invest in gun manufacturers and prisons to put a silver lining on all your mass-shootings.

7: There is a refugee island. It’s called Vanuatu. It’s a pre-third world shithole where Australia send all refugees and we quickly see that what they want isn’t to avoid death and persecution, but to avoid poverty. The concept works well as a deterrent. In America’s case, I propose New Jersey.

6: In Hong Kong, we had squatter villages which were a firehazard, so the government made cheap public housing. Now we have to get rid of them because the mainlanders who are poor would want to come to Hong Kong. The solution is cage homes. What you do is make a huge dorm and make triple tiered bunk beds with cages on the frame so other-wise homeless people have somewhere to stow their rancid possessions as well as sleep. You do the same, but you call them prisons.

5: But wait, it gets even funnier! You lock up material witnesses. For example, Benito Vasquez-Hernandez got locked up for 900 days and counting while awaiting to TESTIFY in someone else’s murder trial. His son only did 727 days waiting to testify, because his prison stint made him schizophrenic and was therefore unfit to testify. The best bit was the murderer immediately confessed, but the trial dragged on because he didn’t tell the court exactly where the body was buried.

4: The USPS is based on the premise that people have a right to communicate. Now that we have the internet, there is no reason to physically subsidise the delivery of letters. Parcels are another matter and there are plenty of parcel services. Simply get the post office to charge a premium on hard to reach locations or allow them not to service these locations and many of the locations will become ghost-towns. OK, this may seem bad if you’re living off a subsidy, but it makes for better efficiency. What you need to do is privatise the USPS. We in the private sector will find a way to strip the business of its assets and leave the rest to implode. USPS workers can go live in cage homes and rural towns can learn to pay for UPS and Fedex. The best thing is politicians don’t need to take the blame. They can blame it on the private sector and the private sector can blame it on inherited inefficiencies and ‘market conditions’. Job done!

3: We can provide food for everyone. We do provide enough food for everyone, but you guys eat too much for your own good and throw away multiples of that again. The solutions are: (1) get companies like Monsanto to make sure farmers can’t earn too much profit. Profit belongs in the stock market for the wealthy to enjoy. (2) Making cheaper produce with less energy is cool because people will pay a premium for it, LOL. Get that company up on NASDAQ stat. (3) Convince the poor to eat alternative foods like insect based proteins, ‘re-manufactured’ food etc. If you add enough HFCS and salt, they’ll lap it up. (4) Keep taking from poor countries and give it to rich countries to throw away. Call this ‘market realities’. Rich people can use videos of starving african kids to encourage their own kids to eat their greens and pledge five bucks to a hunger relief drive and not follow up. It makes no difference because even Oxfam uses hardly any of their received donations to actually relieve hunger. Most of it goes on Admin pay, junkets and other ‘essential’ admin.

2: “But what really makes the Omniprocessor so innovative is that the leftover waste is turned into steam, which powers the machine. If there is leftover power, it goes to powering the community.” It makes it sound great doesn’t it? I made millions consulting for water infrastructure projects and there are reasons it’s not widespread. (1) heating value of the dried sludge is insufficient to power the purification of liquid raw sewage; (2) large scale investment (and economies of scale) is needed to make it economic; (3) You need to make toilets and a sewage system that runs long distances in sparsely populated areas; (4) It’s cheaper to clean nearly clean water than really dirty water. It’s cheaper to use rainwater or artesian water for irrigation and making potable water and process sewage only enough to prevent it spreading disease.

1: This works! In economist-speak the idea is called “tax the middle classes of the rich countries and spend it on humanitarian projects. Label it as a service charge or involuntary donation as people are antsy about taxes. In reality, rich countries do it with a tiny amount of the tax purse, but attach policy strings or make it repayable at ‘risk appropriate interest rates’ (i.e. usury). This allows us to manipulate their governments and we can even bankrupt governments whose policies we don’t like by having the courts uphold judgements in favour of vulture capitalists. We have used this for decades in south and central america, africa and everywhere with greedy lazy people and corrupt or popularist governments.


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

More Boobs - Less Politics ​​

And Now... A Few Links From Our Sponsors